When it comes to military actions that alter the course of history, few are so bold—or technically challenging-as recent American and Israeli attacks on Iran’s nuclear sites. At the center of this ...

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump tried to keep a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran in place Tuesday as reports ...

The U.S. attack on Fordow did real damage to the site. But it also set back the IAEA's oversight of Iran's nuclear program. The post Iran's Nuclear Program Took a Real Hit. So Did IAEA Oversight of It ...

Officials in Israel are acknowledging that some enriched uranium may have survived the powerful U.S. strikes on Iranian ...

Hegseth also took a jab at the news media over ongoing coverage that contradicts the Trump administration's firm stance that ...

President Donald Trump dismissed an earlier Defense Intelligence Agency assessment as inconclusive and premature.

Trump says U.S. strikes "obliterated" key Iranian nuclear sites, setting the program back decades, but sources say an early intel assessment says Iran could rebuild some of its capabilities in months.

With questions mounting over the impact of the U.S. and Israeli onslaught on Iran’s nuclear facilities and military infrastructure, a return to hostilities could be a matter of when, not if.

Experts long argued that airstrikes alone would not be capable of permanently ending Iran's nuclear program absent negotiations.

US airstrikes on Iran set back the regime’s nuclear program between one to two years, but likely “closer to two,” the ...

President Donald Trump affirmed his willingness to strike Iran again if it rebuilds its nuclear program, with NATO's chief ...