and apparently no one working in a science, technology, engineering, or mathematics-related fields may deviate from this far-left viewpoint. “The Supreme Court could destroy affirmative action ...

The latest of these has been led by Monica Rappaccini, better known as A.I.M.'s Scientist Supreme, who has joined forces with ...

With a narrow 5-4 majority, the justices rejected a 2012 decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals, which held that authorizing the sampling of DNA from people who had not been convicted is a breach ...

The United States Supreme Court has today (June 13) unanimously ruled that isolated human genes cannot be patented, but the Justices also ruled that synthetic DNA sequences—known as complimentary DNA ...

“What happens in the Supreme Court is often behind the scenes ... The project is funded by the National Science Foundation’s Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research and ...

Kurt Sitte, the Czech-born scientist who was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment last week on charges of espionage, filed an appeal today in the Israel Supreme Court. Prof. Sitte, until his ...

For Scientific American’s Science Quickly, I’m Rachel Feltman ... Now let’s move on to a somewhat complex environmental ruling from the Supreme Court. The headline here is that in a 5-4 ...